Jim Whitney Economics 311
Country report 1: trade profile sample data for the Philippines

Here is some possibly useful information I've found for the Philippines and a template that you can use for your own country if you want (use only what works for you and feel free to use a different approach). I would never use all of the data in my report, but it gives me plenty to work with.

Legend:
    Bold: type of information
    Fixed width: sample data for the Philippines
    Underlined number: link to data source
    _____: Spaces to fill in with data for your country, income group, or region 

italics: interpretative observation that I might include in the text of a report.
  
Report 1: Trade profile analysis:
    A. Background:
    (1) trade indicators:
        --location: East Asia/Pacific; island nation; __________________________
        --population: 1997 Population, mid-year (millions) 73.4 ______ (1)
        --area: (1000sq.km): 298 (US=9,159) ______ (2c)
 
   (2) development indcators:
        --income per capita:
             GNP per capita 1996 (2c):
                            World Bank        PPP (purchasing power
                            method     Rank   parity method--best)  Rank
      Philippines           $1,160      70      3,550                69
      Lower middle income    1,740              4,180
      ________________      ______     ___     ______                ___
      ___________________   ______
      World                  5,130              6,200
      U.S.                  28,020       8     28,020                 1 
(note: when available, the PPP method is best--it adjusts most carefully for the cost of living)
  
        --classification by income: lower middle-income group ______________ (1)

    B. Trade and its results:
    (1) Extent of trade:
                       Trade (%ofGDP) (2a)
                           1970    1996
      Philippines           43      94
      Lower middle income   ..      52
      ___________          ___     ___
      ___________________  ___     ___
      World                 27      43
      U.S.                  11      24 

Philippine growth in trade has been quite rapid, significantly outpacing the world as a whole (94% in 1996 means an average of 47% for imports and exports as share of GDP, up from a 21.5%  average in 1970). 
  
     (2) Trade trends:
      (trend data:                      1976 1986 1996) (1)
      Exports of goods and services/GDP 19.3 26.3 40.5
                                 1976-86 1987-97 (1)
      (average annual growth)
      GDP                           1.8     3.2
      GNP per capita               -0.8     1.4
      Exports of goods and services 6.0     9.5

      (trend data:                      1976 1986 1996 (1)
      Exports of goods and services/GDP ____ ____ ____
                                  1976-86 1987-97 (1)
      (average annual growth)
      GDP                          ____    ____
      GNP per capita               ____    ____
      Exports of goods and services____    ____
  

since the 1980s, Philippines has had fairly rapid growth (although high population growth has meant a much lower growth rate per capita).
     
   (3) Terms of trade:
                                   1976  1986  1996 (1)
      Export price index (1995=100)  ..    76   100
      Import price index (1995=100)  ..    61   101
      Terms of trade (1995=100)      ..   124    99
      Export price index (1995=100) ___   ___   ___
      Import price index (1995=100) ___   ___   ___
      Terms of trade (1995=100)     ___   ___   ___ 
similar to many LDCs, the Philippines has had a decline in its terms of trade. However, its higher per capita GDP means that it is still better off now than in 1986 overall (for a general equilibrium (PPF diagraam), with exportables on the horizontal axis, the Philippines would be on a higher indifference curve but with a flatter BL in 1996 compared to 1986). 
  
    C. Trade pattern:
    (1) Expected exports:
 
       --Population density:
            Area and population density (2c)
                           Popul/sq.km
      Philippines             240
      Lower middle income      29
      ___________             ___
      ___________________     ___
      World                    44
      U.S.                     30 
the relatively high population density suggests that the Philippines' comparative advantage would be in manufacturing items rather than agricultural items. 
  
         --distinctive characteristics versus other countries in the region/income classification:
      (comparative data for: Philippines / East Asia-Pacific region /
      lower middle-income) (1) relatively...
                                                              Phi Asia Mid
      --urban: Urban population (% of total population)        56  32  42
      --high Child malnutrition (% of children under 5)        30  16  ..
      --high literacy: Illiteracy (% of population age 15+)     5  17  19
      --rapid population growth rate: 1991-97: Population (%) 2.3 1.3 1.2 
 Workspace for distinctive characteristics: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
         --Structure of economy:
                       Labor force in agric.(%)   Urban population (%)(2a)
                           1970    1996            1970        1996
      Philippines           58      46              33          55
      Lower middle income   66      58              28          40
      ___________          ___     ___             ___         ___
      ___________________  ___     ___             ___         ___
      World                 55      49              37          46
      U.S.                   4       3              74          76

                 % of GDP: Agriculture   Industry       Services (2b)
                           1970   1996   1970   1996    1970   1996
      Philippines           25     21     39     32      36     47
      Lower middle income   15     12     43     37      42     51
      ___________          ___     ___   ___    ___     ___    ___
      ___________________  ___     ___   ___    ___     ___    ___
      World                  7            38             55
      U.S.                   3            33             64 

the Philippines still seems somewhat overly involved in agriculture than would seem appropriate given its high population density, but compared to other lower middle income countries, its labor force in agriculture has fallen more and its urban population has grown more. The Philippines' conditions and trends suggest that the country might be expected to export primarily light, laobr-intensive manufacturing items 
  
     (2) Actual exports:
 
        Export commodities: electronics and telecommunications 51%,
        machinery and transport 10%, garments 9%, other 30% (3)
        Export commodities: _______________________________________
        ___________________________________________________________
  
70% of exports are in a few categories of manufactured items.
  
     (3) Trade partners: 
Export destinations: US 34%, Japan 17%, EU 17%, ASEAN 14%,  
Hong Kong 4%, Taiwan 4% (1997 est.) (3)  
Export destinations: _______________________________________________ 
_________________________________________________________________
   
68% of exports destined to large industrial economies (US,Japan,EU), so HO trade plausibly applies to most of the Philippines' trade.
  
   (4) Comparative advantage trends
        --Capital formation trends: Gross capital formation as a percent of GDP  (5a)
                               1976   1986   1996
        World                  23.3%  22.0%  22.3%
        Industrial countries   22.5   20.8   19.7
        Developing countries   25.0   24.2   26.1
        Asia                   21.7   28.4   32.7
        Philippines            31.0   15.2   24.0
        ___________            ____   ____   ____
        ___________            ____   ____   ____ 
fell sharply, then rebounded but sill below average for developing countries and especially for Asia
  
     D. Income trends:
       (Real GDP=billion 1990 currency units, population=million,
       real GDP/capita=thousand 1990 currency units)
                                      1976   1986    1996 (5b)
        Philippines: Real GDP        732.4  884.6  1269.0
                     Pop.             43.4   56.0    71.9
                     Real GDP/Pop     16.9   15.8    17.6
                     10-yr. growth:          -6.5%   11.4%
        U.S.         Real GDP       3981.3  5186.8  6482.7
                     Pop.            218.0   240.7   265.4
                     Real GDP/Pop     18.3    21.5    24.4
                     10 yr. change:           17.5%   13.5%
        ____________ Real GDP        _____   _____    ____
                     Pop.            _____   _____   _____
                     Real GDP/Pop    _____   _____   _____
                     10-yr. growth:          _____   _____
  
Output per capita for the Philippines has not grown as fast as for the U.S., contrary to expectations of the HO model which suggests that convergence should be occurring. Difficulties under the Marcos regime early on and continuing rapid population growth may account for some of this. 
         
Reference list and links:
    1. The World Bank Group--Development Data: Country data (http://www.worldbank.org/data/countrydata/countrydata.html)
(Philippines: Philippines at a Glance)
    2. The World Bank Group--Development Data: Data by topic  (http://www.worldbank.org/data/databytopic/databytopic.html)
(2a. Economic growth and structure: Long term structural change)
(2b. Economic growth and structure: Structure of output)
(2c. Gross National Product: Size of the economy)
    3. CIA Publications (http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/pubs.html) choose link to most recent CIA World Factbook and search by country.
    4. Foreign Labor Statistics Home Page (compares wages and production costs for several countries, but did not include the Philippines)

"Proven" print source:
    5. International Monetary Fund. International Financial Statistics Yearbook.
(HG3881 .I6265)
(5a. World tables: National accounts: Gross capital formation as a percent of GDP)
(5b. Country tables: Philippines and the U.S.)

Other print sources:
    United Nations. Statistical Office. Statistical yearbook. Annuaire statistique. (HA12.5 .U63)
    United Nations. Statistical Office. Yearbook of international trade statistics. (HF91 .U473)
 
Online sites where you may be able to find good links to information:

    International Economics Gateway
    Resources for Economists on the Internet (Bill Goffe)

    WebEc - WWW Resources in Economics
    International Monetary Fund
    Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
    United Nations
    World Bank Group