The Coase theorem and the initial assignment of property rights
"Surveys and experiments reveal that people sometimes demand much more to give something up that they have than they would be willing to pay to acquire it.... The divergence between the buying and selling price is called an endowment effect because the price varies depending on the initial assignment of ownership." (Cooter and Ulen: 91)
The diagram to the right
illustrates consumption for Kelty, who lives on the shore of a lake and derives utility
from the water quality of the lake and from money income (measured in $1,000). Initially, the water quality of the lake is high, and Kelty consumes at point a and enjoys utility Ua. Now suppose a
factory locates on the opposite shore of the lake. Its pollution reduces the water quality
of the lake to Lo. Kelty files a lawsuit to enjoin the factory from polluting the lake. Case 1: Kelty wins the lawsuit and
is awarded the right to a pollution-free lake. Case 2: Kelty loses the lawsuit, and
the factory is awarded the right to pollute the lake. Question: Does Kelty consider the water quality of the lake to be a normal or inferior good? How can you tell? Exercise: In the lower right diagram, sketch Kelty's demand curve Db for water quality when utility is Ub and his demand curve Da for utility Ua. Use your demand curves to show how much more Kelty must be paid to give up Hi-Lo of water quality (Case 1) than he would be willing to pay to retain Hi-Lo of water quality (Case 2). |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Coase Theorem corollary: The particular efficient outcome we get can depend on how property rights are assigned.