Wednesday, February 29, 2012 |
Problem Set 2
1. | a. | State the formula for a country's terms of trade. |
b. | The terms of trade for many lesser developed countries (LDCs) have been declining for many years. Decide whether the following is true or false, and use the online list of Terms of trade indexes to support your answer: "Rising terms of trade is a necessary and sufficient condition for economic growth." | |
2. | a. | State each of the following theorems, which are based on the Heckscher-Ohlin model: (1) the Heckscher-Ohlin (HO) theorem, (2) the factor-price equalization (FPE) theorem, and (3) the Stolper-Samuelson (SS) theorem. | |
b. | Consider South Korea, a small country which starts out as relatively labor-abundant. | ||
(1) | What does the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem predict for South Korea's pattern of trade when it it is a labor-abundant country? | ||
(2) | Illustrate an initial PPF for South Korea, putting capital-intensive products on the horizontal axis. Then suppose that South Korea promotes a high rate of domestic savings and capital formation. Illustrate how the country's production possibilities frontier will change over time. | ||
(3) | Could growth of this type eventually reverse South Korea's direction of trade? Explain briefly. | ||
3. |
Suppose you download some data about Denmark, a small,
capital-abundant country. The data report the percentage price changes resulting from
Denmark's move to freer trade for each of the following items: Denmark's export products,
import-substitute products, labor and capital. Unfortunately, the data got scrambled. All
you end up with are the following unlabeled percentage changes: +16%, -8%, -20%, +40%. According to the Heckscher-Ohlin model, how would you match these values and what they most likely correspond to? Explain briefly. |
|
4. |
Suppose the home country is
capital-abundant and that there are two types of products, capital-intensive
advanced goods (A) and labor-intensive basic goods (B), produced with two
resources, capital (K) and unskilled labor (L). Different people have
different employment situations and different consumption patterns too. In each cell of the table below, use the notation "+, -, 0, ?" to indicate whether Heckscher-Ohlin style free trade would cause the individual's welfare to rise, fall, remain the same or change in an uncertain direction. Briefly explain how you made your decisions. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. |
Decide whether each of the following is or is not consistent with the HO model, and explain your decision in each case: | |
a. | "You implement that Nafta (the North American Free Trade Agreement),...and you're going to hear a giant sucking sound of jobs being pulled out of this country...." | |
b. | "[For the U.S.,] Nafta's benefits would fall on skilled labor, while the unskilled would suffer a ... decline in real income." | |
c. | "An unrestricted U.S.-Mexico free-trade agreement will be a disaster for [unskilled] workers in both countries." | |
d. | With Nafta, overall, "American [unskilled] workers would benefit from the increased supply of lower-cost Mexican products and from increased U.S. sales to Mexico." | |
e. | "International wage-cutting competition...shifts our [US] desirable high-...skilled industries and jobs to other countries." | |
f. | For a capital-abundant country, in the long run, free trade will raise the price of unskilled labor in the country's export industries and lower the price of unskilled labor in the country's import-competing industries. | |
6. |
Consider the following breakdown of the export markets of DCs and LDCs: | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
a. | Which trade is most clearly accounted for by the HO model? Why? | ||||||||||||
b. | What sorts of trade might be especially prominent for the trade between DCs and other DCs? | ||||||||||||
7. |
Suppose that steel output in South Korea is produced by a domestic monopoly. | |
a. | Suppose South Korea engages in no trade in steel. Use a domestic-market supply and demand diagram to depict an initial equilibrium in which South Korea's steel monopolist charges a price above the competitive equilibrium. Label the monopoly price Pm, and label the efficient competitive price Pc. | |
b. | Now suppose that the world price of steel is between Pm and Pc. Depict South Korea's free-trade equilibrium. Indicate South Korea's ordinary gain from trade and its additional gain from trade due to the competition introduced into its steel industry. | |
8. |
This question deals with passages from, Buy American--Why Not? (Los Angeles Times (2009)), an editorial from the Los Angeles Times. | ||
a. | Passage 1b: "[T]he United States is almost alone among the major developed nations and China in not having a significant 'buy domestic' government procurement program." | ||
Fact check this statement. Tip: Look under "Buy national policies" in the index of your textbook. | |||
b. | Passage 4.3: "[T]he usually credible Peterson Institute estimated that such an initiative ["Buy American"] would save or create a meager 9,000 jobs". "But out of a total U.S. labor force of 155 million, the correct answer has to be at least a couple million or more because we are talking about transitioning so much of the U.S. economy -- most of nearly $3 trillion in annual government purchases -- to domestic-only origins". | ||
Fact check: Why do you think the two estimates of the jobs impact vary so much? | |||
c. | Passage 5.1-5.2a: "In his first inaugural speech, President Franklin Roosevelt said that the nation's greatest task was 'to put people to work.' At the time, 13 million Americans were unemployed, and the economy was much better balanced between manufacturing and services." | ||
Fact check: How many people were reported as unemployed in 1933? Link: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/eop/2009/B35.xls | |||
d. | Passage 6.1: "Now, however, there are nearly 30 million effectively unemployed Americans, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics figures for July." | ||
Fact check: How many people were reported as unemployed in July, 2009? Link: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=economic_indicators&docid=f:11jy09.txt.pdf | |||
e. | Passage 7.1: "The United States, with its enormity and geographic diversity, simply cannot prosper in the long term with less than 12% of its GDP coming from manufacturing." | ||
Opinion check: Would you say that this opinion is consistent with the data reported in the spreadsheet Sectoral Contributions to Gross Value Added? Why or why not?. | |||
9. |
a. | Which is your assigned country? | |
b. | Use a web search to locate a newspaper or newsmagazine article published within the past six months that covers international trade, immigration or foreign direct investment as it pertains to your country. (Note that the debt crisis does not fall into these categories, but articles about globalization and growth or globalization and income distribution do relate to these categories.) | ||
(1) | List the title and date of your article, and briefly explain its main point. | ||
(2) | Copy and paste the link to your article in the "PS2" tab of the course spreadsheet. (You will likely have to enter your myOxy username and password to access the spreadsheet.) | ||
10. |
As always, don't forget to staple your work. | |