Friday, January 27, 2012 |
Introduction
(http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/weorepts.htm); myfile: wrldecon_popgt.xls | ||
1970-2010 | ||
World: | Average annual
growth rate (g) |
Doubling time
(=72/g) |
Population | 1.5% | 48 yrs |
Output | 3.6% | 20 yrs |
Trade | 5.9% | 12 yrs |
Output per capita | 2.0% | 36 yrs |
Trade per capita | 4.2% | 17 yrs |
Output has been
growing over 2% faster each year than population
Trade has been growing more than 2% faster each year than output
Output per capita: up 2.0% per year, doubles every 36 years.
True for the US too:
Imports as a share of output | ||
1970 | 2010 | |
World | 12% | 29% |
US | 5% | 16% |
? Why does the US have such
a low import share?
large country
--large workforce
--many domestically available
resources
How globalized are you?
Part 1: Markets and the global economy
Markets rely on the incentive-response mechanism of
benefit-cost behavior by individuals
They provide an institutional mechanism to facilitate voluntary
transactions
Concerns, as always: (1)
efficiency and (2) equity
Key
lessons:
(1) Efficiency: Globalization can make everyone
richer.
(2) Equity: Free-market globalization will make at
least some
people poorer.
Consider 2 ways to get personal computers (PCs)
Option 1: shift L
from clothing to PCs: give up 10 garments to get 1PC Option 2: produce garments and give up 6 of them to get 1PC
|
|
You always have 2 options for getting
something you want:
Option (1) direct production
--
reallocate your own resources to produce it (black box = a factory)
Option (2) indirect production -- produce something and exchange it to get
something else
Indirect production utilizes markets (black box = a market)
trade = indirect production
"James Ingram's (1983) textbook on
international trade contains a lovely parable. He imagines that an entrepreneur
starts a new business that uses a secret technology to convert U.S. wheat,
lumber, and so on into cheap high-quality consumer goods. The entrepreneur is
hailed as an industrial hero; although some of his domestic competitors are
hurt, everyone accepts that occasional dislocations are the price of a
free-market economy. But then an investigative reporter discovers that what he
is really doing is shipping the wheat and lumber to Asia and using the proceeds
to buy manufactured goods--whereupon he is denounced as a fraud who is
destroying American jobs. The point, of course, is that
international trade is an economic activity like any other and can
indeed usefully be thought of as a kind of production process that transforms
exports into imports."
(Paul Krugman. "What Do Undergrads Need to Know About Trade."
AER, May 2003.)
I. The fundamentals of international trade
International trade: flow of Goods and services between countries
Trade = indirect
production via global markets instead of local markets
Trade generates a lot of
controversy: trade
quotebook
(agree or not? -- anonymous vote)
Consider U.S. Imports (wrldecon.popgt.xls)
According to trade critics: given this import trend, what should be happening to US employment?
U.S.
Imports
and Employment (handout -- switch to landscape to print)
Quotebook:
"Forcing our middle class to compete with cheap foreign labor will
result in systemic job loss..."
How would you assess
that quote based on the handout?
Doesn't account for the data
?
What explanation can you offer for the observed positive association between
employment and import share?
Higher employment --> more income --> higher
import share if income elasticity of demand for imports > 1
And vice versa.
The data suggests that employment (and income) influences
imports rather than imports influence employment.