Negations of Categorical Propositions
Before we look at how to form the negation of
our four types of categorical propositions, let's review the translation of them
into QL:
All S are P |
(x) (Sx
⊃
Px) |
No S are P |
(x) (Sx
⊃
~Px) |
Some S are P |
(∃x) (Sx
&
Px) |
Some S are
not P |
(∃x) (Sx
&
~Px) |
|
We know how to negate a proposition: We
simply throw a tilde in front of it. So we can form the negations as follows:
~(x) (Sx
⊃
Px) |
negation of A categorical proposition |
~(x) (Sx
⊃
~Px) |
negation of E categorical proposition |
~(∃x) (Sx
&
Px) |
negation of I categorical proposition |
~(∃x) (Sx
&
~Px) |
negation of O categorical proposition |
Indeed, these are the appropriate negations.
However, we can also form the negations by using the information from the
Traditional Square of Opposition.
Remember that we find "opposites", i.e. negations at opposite corners of the
square. So we have the following negations:
The
negation of |
(x) (Sx
⊃
Px) |
is
|
(∃x) (Sx
&
~Px) |
The
negation of |
(x) (Sx
⊃
~Px) |
is |
(∃x) (Sx
&
Px) |
The
negation of |
(∃x) (Sx
&
Px) |
is |
(x) (Sx
⊃
~Px) |
The
negation of |
(∃x) (Sx
&
~Px) |
is |
(x) (Sx
⊃
Px) |
The
following exercise asks you to use the information you're just acquired to
draw some conclusions about logical equivalence involving categorical
propositions.