Semantic Properties in QL
We just learned how to determine the
truth-conditions for propositions in QL. Now we turn to the question of how we
use this information. For the most part, we have the same semantic
properties in QL as we had in PL. Arguments are valid or invalid; sets of
propositions are consistent or inconsistent; a pair of wffs can be
logically equivalent or not equivalent. However, instead of referring to wffs
which are always true as tautologies, we call them "logical truths" in QL, and
instead of contradictions, we call the QL wffs that come out always false as
"logical falsehoods." Wffs that are neither logical truths nor logical
falsehoods are, as in PL, still referred to as contingencies.
Let's talk about each of these semantic
properties in the context of QL. In order to do this, we need to introduce the
notion of an interpretation of a proposition. An interpretation can
be thought of as a row of the truth table. Returning an example from the last
section, in a domain with two individuals, the proposition "(x)Ex" is
rewritten as "Ea & Eb". An interpretation of "(x)Ex" in a domain of two
individuals is an assignment of truth and falsity to "Ea" and "Eb".
Validity: An argument is valid just in
case, in every domain, and every interpretation, if the premises are true, the
conclusion is true. Otherwise the argument is invalid.
Consistency: A set of propositions in
consistent just in case there is at least one domain in which there is an
interpretation in which all the propositions in the set true. Otherwise the set
is inconsistent.
Logical Truth and Falsehood: A
proposition is logically true just in case it is true in every domain under
every interpretation. A proposition is logically false just in case it is false
in every domain under every interpretation.
Logical Equivalence: Two propositions
are logically equivalent just in case in every domain and every interpretation,
they have the same truth value. Otherwise the propositions are not logically
equivalent.
We now turn to the methods for determining these semantic
properties.
|