Multicultural
Summer Institute |
||
That
Was Then, This Is Now: Identity, History and Law |
| Reading | Haney
Lopez, Ian F. "The
Social Construction of Race." Critical Race Theory:
The Cutting Edge. Ed. Richard Delgado. Philadelphia:
Temple University Press, 1995. 191-203 |
| Supplemental Reading | Mann, Coramae Richey. "Law
and its Enforcements against Minorities." Unequal Justice: A
Question of Color. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press,
1993. 115-121. Race: The Power of an Illusion. Exec. Prod. Larry Adelman. Videotape. Public Broadcasting Service and California Newsreel, 2003. |
| Assignment | Topic and Thesis for Paper #1 due in seminar |
| GOAL | 1) Understanding
the nuances of the social construction of race. 2) Appreciation for the myriad ways law has been used to reinforce white supremacy/minority marginality in the United States |
OUTLINE
VIDEO SEGMENTS from
“Race: The Power of an Illusion”
FIRST: (Part 1)
0:40-end (0:55) Deconstructs race as biology
SECOND [Part 2] 0:00-0:15 Discusses the development of the idea that became
“race.”
THIRD
[Part 3] 0:13:45-0:26 The legal construction of race (White by Law)
Textual Analysis:
Whenever you have a new piece of reading you should
attempt to analyze it using the following rubric or set of question. They
basically reduce to: What? How? Who? Why?
Let's try this approach on Haney Lopez's "Social Construction of Race" article
Argument: What is the thesis? Race is a social construct.
Method: How does the author prove their thesis? historical; autobiographical; legal citation
Audience: Who is the intended audience of the piece? college-educated, students of law
Objective: Why was this piece written?
What is the goal of the author/piece?
What are they trying to do?
IN SEMINAR, could do a similar exercise with the Mann piece.
Connections to Southland. Read pages 97-98) and discuss connections to Mann and Haney Lopez articles.
ideology: the body of ideas reflecting the social needs and aspirations of an individual, group, class, or culture.
A set of doctrines or beliefs that form the basis of a political, economic, or other system.Ethnicity: of or relating to large groups of people classed according to common racial, national, tribal, religious, linguistic, or cultural origin or background (Source: Merriam-Webster)
Race:
(from Merriam-Webster)
2 a : a family, tribe, people, or nation belonging to the same stock b
: a class or kind of people unified by community of interests, habits, or
characteristics <the English race>
3 a : an actually or potentially interbreeding group within a
species; also : a taxonomic category (as a subspecies)
representing such a group b : BREED
c : a division of mankind possessing traits that are transmissible
by descent and sufficient to characterize it as a distinct human type
Race: (from
Ian Haney Lopez)
"A
vast group of people loosely bound together by historically contingent, socially
significant elements of their morphology and/or ancestry" (Haney Lopez
193).
Ian Haney Lopez discussed
features of “racial fabrication” (196):
In cultural studies we often refer to words and the meanings "commonly associated" with those words as the signifier (the word, e.g. man) and signified (the associated meaning, e.g. masculine) pair. Note, also that the signified can itself be a signifier and also have signified(s). i.e. man->masculine->muscular. This is known as a chain of signifiers.
Consider how
the signifieds (cultural
meanings) of
each of the races (White, Black, Asian, Latino) are
defined in relation to each other: e.g. dark skin implies sexuality and guilt,
so light-skinned people are innocent of sexual assault, by definition.
Consider
what happens when signifiers are combined (i.e. male and Black). What particular
signifieds does this combination have?
What happens when you switch one of the signifiers (i.e. male and Asian, or female and Black)? How do the signifieds change?
From
http://www.pbs.org/race
TEN THINGS EVERYONE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT RACE
Our eyes tell us that
people look different. No one has trouble distinguishing a Czech from a Chinese,
but what do those differences mean? Are they biological? Has race always been
with us? How does race affect people today?
There's less - and more -
to race than meets the eye:
1. Race is a modern
idea. Ancient
societies, like the Greeks, did not divide people according to physical
distinctions, but according to religion, status, class, even language. The
English language didn't even have the word 'race' until it turns up in a 1508
poem by William Dunbar referring to a line of kings.
2. Race has no genetic
basis. Not one
characteristic, trait or even gene distinguishes all the members of one
so-called race from all the members of another so-called race.
3. Human subspecies
don't exist. Unlike
many animals, modern humans simply haven't been around long enough or isolated
enough to evolve into separate subspecies or races. Despite surface appearances,
we are one of the most genetically similar of all species.
4. Skin color really is
only skin deep.
Most traits are inherited independently from one another. The genes influencing
skin color have nothing to do with the genes influencing hair form, eye shape,
blood type, musical talent, athletic ability or forms of intelligence. Knowing
someone's skin color doesn't necessarily tell you anything else about him or
her.
5. Most variation is
within, not between, "races." Of the small amount of total human variation, 85% exists
within any local population, be they Italians, Kurds, Koreans or Cherokees.
About 94% can be found within any continent. That means two random Koreans may
be as genetically different as a Korean and an Italian.
6. Slavery predates
race. Throughout
much of human history, societies have enslaved others, often as a result of
conquest or war, even debt, but not because of physical characteristics or a
belief in natural inferiority. Due to a unique set of historical circumstances,
ours was the first slave system where all the slaves shared similar physical
characteristics.
7. Race and freedom
evolved together. The
U.S. was founded on the radical new principle that "All men are created
equal." But our early economy was based largely on slavery. How could this
anomaly be rationalized? The new idea of race helped explain why some people
could be denied the rights and freedoms that others took for granted.
8. Race justified social
inequalities as natural. As the race idea evolved, white superiority became
"common sense" in America. It justified not only slavery but also the
extermination of Indians, exclusion of Asian immigrants, and the taking of
Mexican lands by a nation that professed a belief in democracy. Racial practices
were institutionalized within American government, laws, and society.
9. Race isn't
biological, but racism is still real. Race is a powerful social idea that gives people different
access to opportunities and resources. Our government and social institutions
have created advantages that disproportionately channel wealth, power, and
resources to white people. This affects everyone, whether we are aware of it or
not.
10. Colorblindness will
not end racism.
Pretending race doesn't exist is not the same as creating equality. Race is more
than stereotypes and individual prejudice. To combat racism, we need to identify
and remedy social policies and institutional practices that advantage some
groups at the expense of others.